The beginning third of the movie focuses on the Finch children, Jem and Scout. Who, along with their friend Dill, try to get a look at the elusive 'Boo' Radley. A local 'nut' supposedly kept locked in the basement of his family home that happens to be just down the street from the Finches. This is the most purely enjoyable section of the film wonderfully performed by the three talented youngsters. For an adult, watching them in their childish euphoria will conjure memories of carefree summer evenings spent in the pursuit of innocent pleasures.

When Atticus must defend Tom Robinson, a black man falsely accused of raping the white trash Mayella Ewell, this movie becomes a classic courtroom drama. Watching this ignorant and blatant liar spit venom at the jury simultaneously inspires both hopelessness and anger in the viewer.

The last section of the film tells how 'Boo' Radley finally comes out of hiding. Robert Duvall, in his film debut, plays the reclusive 'Boo' to perfection without uttering a single word.

Shot symbolically in black and white, this profoundly moving story blends humor, compassion and pathos with cruelty, hatred and tense drama. Like Sunset Boulevard and Apocalypse Now a voice-over narration sets the tone and keeps the story line from unraveling.

Eric
I truly enjoy ripping into Patrick's reviews, but I can't touch this one. He is right on the money. The children's summer adventure always makes me think of my own childhood and the courtroom drama is better than A Time To Kill.

What I do find interesting is that much of this film is about a racial crime. Yet the biggest black part in the movie, outside the defendant, is the old Hollywood racial cliché, the maid! This movie attempts to say 'Don't believe something just because you have heard it is so', then it reinforces a racial stereotype. I know I have to take into account when this story takes place and when this movie was made, but still I found that interesting.

Scott
Any time a movie is made that is based on a great work of literature, I always worry about what Hollywood will do to it. With To Kill a Mockingbird though, I saw the movie first and then read the book. Which is really the best way to do it. If you've read the book and then see the movie, you will be upset by all that is left out of the film. But if you see the movie first, and then read the book, you will be delightfully surprised by all the extras the book has to offer. I think that's true of any movie based on a book.

Looking back on the movie, now that I have read the book, the only problem with the translation from paper to celluloid is that in the book, the perspective is completely from Scout Finch, the daughter. She narrates the book and while she is unable to fully understand the events going on around her, we the readers, are able to put the full story together by the information she gives us. The movie does this to a certain extent, but not as fully as in the book.

Gregory Peck, never one of my favorite actors, plays the role of Atticus perfectly. In fact he does such a good job in this film, that I wanted to know more about his character. What happened to his wife? Why do his kids call him by his first name? How did he go from being the 'best shot in the county' to being the quiet respectable lawyer?

I agree with Eric about the irony of one of the main black characters being a maid. In the book, she has a much bigger part and is much more of a major influence on the children's lives, but here she is reduced, as Eric pointed out, to a racial stereotype.

Although not as good as the book, To Kill a Mockingbird is a great movie. It's the kind that Hollywood supposedly never makes. I wonder how it slipped through?

Photos © Copyright 1962 Universal All Rights Reserved