Movie Review

Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom

"If adventure has a name... it must be Indiana Jones."

Directed by: Steven Spielberg

Starring:

| More
Average:

Harrison Ford does his best Bogart impression. Indiana Jones And The Temple of Doom is easily the weakest installment in the Indiana Jones trilogy. It puts Jones on a holier than though pedestal and surrounds him with idiots. The plot is awkward, even when fast paced.

The movie starts out great. In fact, the first part of the movie is the best part of the movie. Harrison Ford walks into a Chinese nightclub dressed like Rick from Casablanca. He haggles with some Chinese gangsters and pandemonium ensues as everyone, including the second rate singer, Kate Capshaw, scurry around the room looking for an antidote and a diamond. They end up jumping out of a window into a car driven by a 12 year old named Short Round. They get into a plane and then bail out into an inflatable lifeboat and go down river. It is a great opening. However, the film goes down hill from there.

The group eventually comes to a village where all the children have been taken away as well as a sacred stone. Jones, along with the singer and Short Round, agree to retrieve the stone. If anything was made clear in Raiders of the Lost Ark, it was that Jones is a self-satisfying person and works best alone. College students are nothing more than a job to him, yet in Temple of Doom he hangs out with a kid and a ditzy blonde. Sure, they are there for comic relief but in Raiders, Jones himself took care of that.

The climax of the movie is bad. It takes place on a rope bridge across an unbelievably high chasm with an alligator filled river below. Can everybody see how this is going to end? Sure, Jones tells Short Round, in Chinese, to hold on to the railing. Short Round then translates 'Hold on lady we go for ride.' Jones cuts the bridge in half and bodies go flying to the ever-hungry carnivores below. The effects here are so fake it is almost an embarrassment to the movie series. But it gets worse. Then Jones plays tug of war with the bag holding the sacred stones. He starts ranting about an offended god. How about ranting about an offended audience. Ironically, Temple of Doom was the movie that prompted the then new PG-13 rating, but now is only enjoyable to those under that age.

There is also the scene that Spielberg claimed to later regret putting in the movie. The one where the still beating heart is pulled out of the man's chest. Spielberg also regretted all the guns in E.T. so he edited them out of the new version. Spielberg is so damn politically correct that I wonder if he can even sleep at night worrying about all the Why would Jones surround himself with such idiots? negative images he puts in his 'family' films? 'Kate, I can't sleep. I am worried that A.I. might offend future robots.'

Okay, this is Indiana Jones and the pace is great. Raiders was personal. It was Jones after a relic. It was a smooth adventure story. Temple of Doom is Jones getting a relic, saving a village as well as a bunch of children, romancing this two-bit blonde and channeling an ancient deity.

At least Spielberg and George Lucas returned to better form in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade.

Did you enjoy Eric's review? Give this review a thumbs up. +0 Give this review a thumbs down. -0
Back to Top

Reviewed on: April 20th, 2008
Harrison Ford in Paramount Pictures Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1984)

The only problem with this installment is that it is a children's movie.Photo copyright: Paramount Pictures (1984)

This is the weakest in the series, but I think your most accurate line Eric, is "Temple of Doom was the movie that prompted the then new PG-13 rating, but now is only enjoyable to those under that age." The thing about this movie is that it is a kid's movie. Both the first and the third, while enjoyed by kids, were both more mature films. This one however, is quite clearly aimed at kids and it suffers for it, despite having a fast pace and some set pieces that still stand up fairly well today.

It had been over ten years since I'd seen this movie, and out of the trilogy, this is definitely the one I'd seen the least number of times. I always remembered Short Round being the most annoying thing about it, but I was wrong. He's not so horrible. His character only goes over the top when at the end he starts fighting grown men and winning when they're escaping from the mine.

No, the most annoying thing about this movie is Willie Scott, the singer as played by Kate Capshaw. Eric, you mention the lack of chemistry between Ford and Capshaw. Since she and Spielberg were starting the romance that would lead to their eventual marriage, maybe Ford felt weird showing passion toward her in front of his friend. Or, more likely perhaps, she's just a really bad actress.

Some character points about Jones have been fairly inconsistent throughout the series. For instance, at the end of this movie, Jones says about returning the Shankara stone to its people that he didn't keep it because, "...they'd just put it in a museum where it would be just another rock collecting dust." He also goes on about fortune and glory several times in this movie. Yet, in the third movie, his mantra is consistently, "That belongs in a museum!". Also, in the beginning of the first movie, Jones scoffs at the idea that the Ark of the Covenant might contain any special powers, saying, "I don't believe in magic, a lot of superstitious hocus pocus." Given the events of this movie (which take place before the events of the first), shouldn't he at least be open to the idea?

Despite all the problems with this movie, it is still an Indiana Jones movie. And Indiana Jones is still one of the greatest film characters of all time. Even in this installment, I get that chill that starts at my neck and runs all the way back down to my childhood, when I hear the strands of that theme music. It's just too bad that this time around, Lucas and Spielberg chose to dumb down the franchise. They forgot the rule about movie making that says, kids will watch and enjoy movies made for adults, but very seldom does it work the other way around.

Did you enjoy Scott's review? Give this review a thumbs up. +0 Give this review a thumbs down. -0
Back to Top

Photos © Copyright Lucasfilm Ltd. (1984)

Number of Comments: (0) --- Add a comment