We waste our money, so you don't have to!
Most Liked Reviews |

Shop for I am a Fugitive from a Chain Gang related products at Amazon.com
US Release Date:
November 19th, 1932
Eric
![]() |
Patrick
![]() |
Average
|

In the early 1930's Hollywood actually made a conscience effort to put out socially moral films. Public Enemy is one of the most notable and best. Another one that should not be over looked is I am a Fugitive from a Chain Gang. Sure it's a crappy title, but it is a pretty good film.Returning World War I veteran James Allen, turns down a factory job, and turns into a hobo. He gets arrested for a robbery that he didn't commit and ends up in a chain gang. He escapes, and goes to Chicago. He gets a job in construction and before you klnow it he is a successful engineer.
A girl he meets finds out his past and black mails him into marrying her. She has affairs on him and spends his money like water. When he meets and falls in love with Helen he asks his wife for a divorce. She stands good on her threat and notifies the authorities.
James agrees to go back to the chain gang with a promise that it is only temporary. At least when it is over he can get his divorce and marry Helen. However, the warden is a bit upset about all the negative things James publicly said about the chain gang and has no plan to ever let James out early.
I am a Fugitive from a Chain Gang is a look at a prison system no longer in existence. It is also a look at social conditions from nearly a hundred years ago. When James first meets Helen he asks her if she is available. She gives the politically incorrect response, "I am free, white and 21." Also it shows a guard keeping track of the inmates by having one list of whites and one of Negroes.
The movie tries to show that being a fugitive is a difficult bad thing. However, James meets up with an old friend who supplies him with alcohol and a prostitute for a night. When he first meets Marie she practically begs him for sex. According to this movie, being a fugitive means having a good time unless you get caught.
The ending is very obscure. It is supposed to be a lesson but it makes for a weak ending when the main characters final fate is never revealed.
![]() |
Did you enjoy Eric's review? |


The grandaddy of all chain gang epics. Photo Copyright: Warner Bros. (1932)
The only part of the movie that differs greatly from the book is Allen’s second escape. In the movie he steals a truck and uses dynamite to blow up a bridge. According to the novel he made his final escape by hiding on a watermelon truck and was gone an hour before the guards missed him. But hey, Hollywood has to entertain after all.
Paul Muni is the great forgotten movie star from the 1930’s. He was in the original Scarface and was nominated six times for the Best Actor Oscar, including this movie, and winning for The Life of Emile Zola in 1937. He later won both an Emmy and a Tony. Sadly, outside of classic movie buffs, his name is now all but forgotten. One explanation for his lack of face recognition today is the fact that, like Lon Chaney, he was famous for disappearing behind his characters through make-up, costumes and accents.
This movie is a spare, hard hitting pre-code classic. Sure some of the acting is a bit melodramatic but the scenes in the prison camp set the standard for everything that has followed. Every chain gang picture from Cool Hand Luke to O Brother, Where Art Thou? owes a debt to Warner Bros’ I Am a Fugitive from a Chain Gang. The down on his luck hobo look that Muni sports here would be copied by Joel McCrea in Sullivan’s Travels and by Humphrey Bogart in Treasure of the Sierra Madre. Clearly this is the granddaddy of that subgenre of the prison movie, the chain gang epic. A must see for every serious movie buff.
![]() |
Did you enjoy Patrick's review? |
Photos © Copyright 1932 Warner Bros. All Rights Reserved